Ange Postecoglou remained defiant in the face of more debate over Tottenham’s set-piece issues and insisted they would not copy the “strategy” adopted by Arsenal.
Spurs have shipped 14 goals from set-pieces – excluding penalties – in the Premier League this season after they conceded twice from corners in Sunday’s 3-2 home loss to the Gunners.
Leaders Arsenal have become set-piece kings since Mikel Arteta recruited specialist coach Nicolas Jover and one of his tactics was to have Ben White attempt to dislodge the gloves of Tottenham goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario.
Whether it worked or not can be disputed but what is clear is that Vicario has been targeted in recent months from corners and free-kicks after notable struggles against Manchester City and Everton earlier this year.
Quizzed on set-pieces again before Thursday’s trip to Chelsea, Postecoglou recalled the lyrics from ‘You May Be Right’ by the famous singer Billy Joel.
“I’ve answered this question and I don’t think it satisfies people, but no I don’t see it as an issue. It’s something that we work on along with everything in our game,” Postecoglou claimed.
“To quote Billy Joel, you may be right, I may be crazy, but it’s maybe a lunatic you’re looking for. I’m just not interested in it. I never have been.
“Enough of you (media) have done enough research on me to know this is not the first time I’ve been questioned about set-pieces in my coaching career. There is an underlying reason for that which I’m very, very comfortable with.
“Eventually I will create a team that has success and it won’t be because of working on set-pieces.”
On White’s interference of Vicario’s gloves, Postecoglou claimed: “It’s a strategy. You can label it, but it’s a strategy.
“I don’t take a lot of interest in that stuff, never have. I’m not casting judgement, but I just don’t really care. If people are going to think that’s going to give them an advantage or whatever, I just don’t worry about that stuff. I just try to focus on building teams that win things.
“I know it’s great theatre. Whether he’s trying to undo his glove, tickle his armpit, or whatever. I don’t care. I try to get my players not to worry about that stuff, not focus on that stuff. It’s not important.
“And if you want to go down that avenue, what’s he supposed to do. Turn around and throw a punch and knock him out or say, ‘please don’t touch me’. What does that do?
“Seriously, we’re not in the school yard. It’s never been where my focus lies.
“To be honest, if I saw one of my players do it I’d be saying, ‘mate, seriously? Get the ball and play some football’. That doesn’t mean it’s not a strategy that can’t be used, but I just don’t care about it.”
All eyes will be on how Spurs cope with set-pieces at Stamford Bridge but the fixture also conjures up memories of the dramatic clash between the teams at Tottenham in November.
The 4-1 defeat was the first league loss of Postecoglou’s tenure, although the score only tells half the story with the hosts reduced to nine men but being applauded off after the derby remained in the balance until stoppage time.
Postecoglou reflected: “The manner in which we played I think maybe gave people a small insight into what we’re trying to create here and the way we’re going about it and deal with challenges.
“Subsequent to that we’re still trying to do it the same way.
“We haven’t always succeeded but I think all the pain we’re going through this year is going to hold us in good stead.”
Despite recent inconsistencies, Tottenham have enjoyed a fine debut season under Postecoglou but opposite number Mauricio Pochettino is under scrutiny after Chelsea’s lavish spending.
“I think there is an avenue there (for success) but it’s not guaranteed and it certainly isn’t inevitable,” Postecoglou conceded.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here