STEVEN BRADLEY believes Dundee United ‘got away’ with one after Kieran Freeman escaped a red card at Livingston.
The United right-back was promptly hooked by manager Jim Goodwin after referee Matthew McDermid opted not to send him off for hauling back Cristian Montano in Wednesday night’s draw at the Tony Macaroni Arena.
Freeman was already on a yellow for clattering Andrew Shinnie, and he lasted just 33 minutes before Goodwin felt the need to protect from a red card. But Bradley, who scored his first Livi goal on the night, echoed manager David Martindale in suggesting United should not have been afforded the opportunity to spare the defender a suspension.
The visitors went on to claim a point via Aziz Behich’s second-half equaliser, leaving Livingston without a Premiership victory since February 4.
“Kieran Freeman should have been sent off for a second yellow,” Bradley insisted. “The Dundee United manager took him off, which tells you everything. By taking him off they got away with it.
“And there was a tackle on big Luiyi [de Lucas, by Sadat Anaku] which was questionable as well. At the time I thought that was definitely a red. With VAR it’s different and a bit confusing because you don’t always know what’s going on sometimes.
“It’s hard for refs because they have only seen what we’ve seen a lot of the time, but they have people talking in their ear now too. So it’s hard for them as well. Some decisions are always going to be debatable, that’s part of football.
READ MORE: David Martindale 'aggrieved' and 'astounded' by refereeing calls
“The negative thing with VAR I would say is the time it takes, you are left wondering for a while what’s going on and it could be speeded up a bit. If they make the right decision then they can take how long they want really.
“But it disrupts the flow of the game, although that can help you if you’re on the back foot - although not if you are on top of a team and want to go forward! So it has its pros and cons.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here