A fool or a knave? That was the question left hanging by Kezia Dugdale's remarkably ill-timed and divisive suggestion that Jeremy Corbyn does not want to bring together Labour's warring factions, after a remarkably conciliatory victory speech from the UK leader yesterday.
Just minutes after Corbyn finished, with him still surrounded by jubilant supporters in the hall, she rushed out a declaration that he faced a "difficult task" healing the party.
Corbyn's plea for unity, for the need to "wipe the slate clean" had been summarily rejected by the Scottish party leader.
After what was probably the most bitter leadership election in Labour's entire history, orchestrated by those who moved heaven and earth to oust him – and Dugdale must count as one of them – she sought to reignite warfare while the participants in the last battle are still licking their wounds. And then she compounded her error by later attempting to row back on her earlier statements.
It was a most unnecessary declaration of hostilities by her and one that will surely come back to haunt her in the weeks and months that follow.
Despite her backing for Owen Smith, she could quite easily have opted for a neutral form of words, simply congratulating Corbyn, wishing him well and offering constructive support.
There are those within Labour's ranks at Westminster who will never accept him leading the party and who have scant respect for the overwhelming mandate won by him. Her words will only stoke their ire.
Dugdale's close association with Labour's only Scottish MP Ian Murray, who was a key player in the summer shadow cabinet coup against Corbyn, will also aggravate such tensions.
The fact that Murray refuses to sit in Corbyn's shadow cabinet at Westminster, but serves in Dugdale's Holyrood-based frontbench, is also a running sore.
Corbyn's most senior supporters, like shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and UK elections chair Jon Trickett, reacted to Dugdale's remarks in reasoned tones. They are to be congratulated.
However, less restrained Corbyn-backers may conclude that by picking a fresh fight with the UK leader, she has shown gross misjudgement. Or is intent on provoking another challenge.
After presiding over the calamity of her party slumping into third place behind the Tories at Holyrood, many Labour supporters will feel that her attentions would be better focused on working for a revival for her party than with picking fresh battles with her Westminster counterpart.
This newspaper supports independence but believes that a strong Scottish Labour party is vital in holding the Government to account. Labour's traditional values have always included unity. By her words Dugdale has betrayed them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here