The Better Together campaign that kept the union intact in 2014 was based on a simple proposition.
Country was deemed to be more important than party: Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Tories put aside historic rivalries to fight for a supposedly higher cause.
However, while Better Together helped win the referendum, its very existence proved to be a nightmare for its leading member.
Labour, which provided most of the personnel, suffered for its alliance with the Tories and has never recovered.
Two years on, and with the First Minister seeming to move inexorably towards a second vote, a Better Together reunion is highly unlikely.
If Labour took part in a similar coalition, it is almost certain there would be a revolt by party members.
In any case, the result of May’s Holyrood election means Labour would not be the strongest voice in a new campaign group.
As former Labour MP Tom Harris has said, Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson as leader of the opposition would have to front the group, and that would mean the debate quickly becoming one framed around 'Scotland versus the Tories'.
Let's be clear: as a paper which supports independence, this would be good news for the Yes movement in terms of garnering votes. But it would leave the debate empty of substance. We need to work hard on answering the questions which proved problematic before - chiefly the economy.
What does seem evident is that Labour's decline is becoming part of the growing catalogue of events which is hastening the end of the union.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here