ROSEMARY GORING (“Pardons do matter to make amends to those wronged,” The Herald, October 25) repeats the claim 81 witches were burned in Prestonpans during the era of witchcraft persecution.
The origin of this myth is that a decade or so ago a wealthy businessman bought the title “Baron of Prestoungrange” and decided to reconvene the local Baron Court and pardon the 81 witches his informants believed had been convicted in the late 16th century.
This attracted wide attention, and was a shrewd and very successful advertising ploy.
At the risk of spoiling the fun, however, it may be worth pointing out baron courts and church courts were absolutely not empowered to try witchcraft cases.
There were only two legal processes for trying witchcraft: one was through the High Court of Justiciary, and the other was for the interested parties to apply for a special “commission” from the Privy Council or from Parliament to try the case locally.
Baron Baillies were allowed to question suspects, but had no powers to judge them.
Obviously, then, since the Prestongrange Baron Court could never have condemned witches in the first place, a resurrected 21st century re-enactment could hardly pardon them.
Quite apart from that, a total of 81 witches condemned in Prestonpans is likely to be wildly inaccurate. I spent several years researching East Lothian witchcraft from original sources, and found evidence for just over 200 executions in the whole county between 1590 and 1700.
During the notorious North Berwick witchcraft panic of 1590-91, “evidence” was extorted of a witch meeting at Acheson’s Haven near Prestonpans.
What the Baron of Prestongrange’s informants seem to have done is assumed that everyone mentioned in the course of the North Berwick and Acheson’s Haven affairs must have been arrested, condemned and executed – an assumption they were hardly entitled to make.
It is shameful even one woman should have been deprived of her life for practising witchcraft, but if any more than half a dozen Prestonpans residents can be proven to have been executed for it between 1590 and 1700, I will eat my pointy hat.
D. M. Robertson, 47 Forthview Road, Longniddry, East Lothian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here