Iain Macwhirter makes some good points (The EU referendum, Project Fear II, and the thorny path the SNP must tread on Europe, Comment, January 17). What is surprising is that, in the face of the evidence, so many left-leaning independistas are declaring their intention to vote for staying in the present EU, albeit "with a heavy heart".
Don't they realise the EU has been captured by market fundamentalists and turned into a neo-liberal project based not on democracy but on the market? The distinguished economist Wolfgang Streeck describes this process as "the transformation of the Keynesian political-economic institutional system of post-war capitalism into a neo-Hayekian economic regime". In other words, the democratic ideals of the original founders of the EU, and the needs of society, have been subordinated to the requirements of the European Central Bank, and, in effect, it is not the people who rule the EU, but capital.
Just remember what the Troika did to the Greeks, and what is involved in the present TTIP proposals to tighten the grip of transnational business over the social demands of autonomous nation-states, particularly concerning health and public service. The EU is now implementing in full what is termed "the Washington Consensus". With this, social democracy as we understand it is not compatible.
So why are the SNP, the Greens and the radical left seemingly united in propping up a system which is so inimical to their basic raison d'etre? The voting public deserves better treatment than this. Surely we are entitled to a full explanation from these party leaders and to a proper discussion of all these issues long before the referendum takes place?
Randolph Murray
Rannoch
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel