SPILT orange juice, a plane being left “too long in the sun”, and a drunk pilot are among some of the bizarre official reasons for flight delays, according to a study.
A study of thousands of compensation claims by experts has unearthed some bizarre reasons for flight delays and horror stories from UK passengers.
One of the weirdest cases unearthed by FlightDelays.co.uk involved an easyJet trip from Liverpool to Malaga.
A passenger accidentally spilt some orange juice, causing an electrical fault that grounded the plane. One passenger took the airline to court for compensation for their flight delays and was awarded about £345.
Four years previously, Jet2 cancelled a flight to Manchester, claiming the aircraft had spent too long in the sun. A passenger was paid about £400 compensation for the cancellation and the fact the flight was delayed by 24 hours.
Another plane was five hours late after a bat flew into the aircraft as it was landing. An engineer had to be flown from Montpellier-Mediterranee Airport, France, to Luton to complete safety checks after the plane was struck.
Another horror story involved flight EZY7104 from Liverpool to Madrid last July when a passenger won £220.
Passengers were variously told the flight had been delayed because the aircraft was faulty and later that the pilot had turned up drunk.
Steve Phillips, at flight compensation expert Flightdelays.co.uk, said: “We would advise everyone to take the time to look into whether they are qualified to receive compensation.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here