Four men who conned banks into handing over £160 million for faked contracts to lay fibre optic cables in sewers have been jailed.
Stephen Dartnell, 60; George Alexander, 50; Simon Mundy, 50, and Carl Cumiskey, 56, were all convicted of the three-year scam after a five-month trial at Southwark Crown Court.
Dartnell and Alexander, working for Total Asset Finance (TAF), conspired with Cumiskey, of H2O Networks Limited, to create, sell and sign falsely inflated or entirely fabricated contracts from H2O to lenders Barclays Bank and KBC Bank.
And Mundy was paid nearly £900,000 in bribes to act as an "inside man" at KBC to authorise the loans to Warrington-based TAF.
Between 2007 and 2010 nearly £160 million in loans were secured but all money was repaid to Barclays and KBC's total losses amounted to £117 million, the court heard.
Mundy used the money to pay his mortgage, while Alexander made a personal gain of £3.1 million.
H2O's business model was to use the sewer network to install fibre optic cables and the company had offered services to councils, universities and NHS trusts, the court heard.
Two cities, Bournemouth and Dundee had even reached agreements with H2O to become so-called "fibrecities", connecting every building to its sewer network.
The fraud was eventually exposed when staff at Tendring District Council and Barclays questioned an inflated figure on a contract.
"Principal offender" Dartnell, of King's Lynn, in Norfolk, shrugged at his family in the public gallery as he was sent down for 15 years after being convicted of two counts of fraud by false representation and one charge of giving corrupt payments.
Dartnell's "right-hand man" Alexander and H2O finance director Cumiskey, who were both convicted of two counts of fraud, were jailed for 12 years and 10 years respectively.
And Mundy was handed a seven-year jail term after being convicted of one count of fraud and one of corrupt payments.
H2O's founder, Elfed Wynn Thomas, of Conwy, North Wales, was acquitted of one count of fraud and exonerated by the judge as having been unaware of the Ponzi-style scheme funding his business.
In sentencing the four men at the same court, Judge Michael Gledhill QC said: "The evidence against you is compelling.
"Not one of you has accepted dishonest involvement in these offences. Of course, you have each accepted that with hindsight that fraud was committed, but have sought to exonerate yourselves.
"One of the least attractive aspects of the case has been the attempts of each of you to blame others, including each other, for what happened."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article