POLICE Scotland spent almost £14,000 securing a Hillsborough inquest QC to represent the force in the scandal over illegal spying on the suspected sources of journalists.
Jeremy Johnson had represented West Midlands Police during the inquests into the deaths arising from the Hillsborough disaster.
It came after anti- corruption officers at Police Scotland illegally used the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act in a bid to flush out a newspaper’s confidential sources.
It follows a newspaper story on shortcomings in the original investigation into the killing of Emma Caldwell. The force wrongly believed serving and former police officers had played a role in the leak and tried to track them down.
A hearing of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal deals with complaints about the misuse of covert techniques by public bodies. The tribunal was a “remedies” hearing as Police Scotland had admitted that the use of their powers had been unlawful.
According to Police Scotland, the force was was invoiced £13,785 for senior counsel’s work in dealing with the six cases, covering the period between February and July 2016.
Scottish Conservative shadow justice secretary Douglas Ross said the force was “forever complaining” about a lack of resources. He added: “People won’t have much sympathy with that line in light of these revelations.”
A force spokesman said it needed to be “appropriately represented” and Mr Johnson had the experience to do so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article