AN inquiry into the avoidable deaths of six babies at Crosshouse Hospital near Kilmarnock will not be independent, according to patient safety campaigners.
The group, Action for a Safe and Accountable People’s NHS (ASAP NHS) has called on health secretary Shona Robison to consider appointing the Health and Safety Executive, or England’s Care Quality Commission (CQC) to carry out the investigation instead.
It said NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland, which was appointed by Ms Robison to carry out the probe, could not be relied upon to be impartial about NHS Scotland.
Campaigner Rab Wilson, of ASAP NHS, said: “How can Healthcare Improvement Scotland investigate maternity services in the Scottish NHS, which it is part of? The OECD has already criticised the Scottish Government for ‘marking its own homework’. This is another case of putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop.”
Shadow health secretary Donald Cameron backed the call for an independent report into concerns uncovered by the BBC. He said: “With HIS being a part of the NHS, they are unable to provide a truly independent viewpoint, and in a matter as serious as this it is vital that we have an objective analysis of what has happened.”
Health Secretary Shona Robison said: “I have complete confidence in NHS HIS, and they are the best people to undertake the independent scrutiny required for this review. I have asked them to report back to me at the earliest opportunity. If there are lessons to be learned or improvements which need to be made, we will not hesitate to act.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here