Voters are fed up with Tory critics of David Cameron turning the EU referendum campaign into "a kind of leadership bid for Boris Johnson", Ken Clarke has warned.
The veteran MP dismissed the former London mayor as a "nicer version of Donald Trump" leading a campaign based on immigration fears that were "about as relevant" to real issues as the controversial Republican's US presidential push.
He suggested many pro-Brexit campaigners were more interested in toppling the Prime Minister than having an informed debate about the merits of continued EU membership.
Read more: Boris Johnson accused of 'nasty game' by comparing EU to Hitler superstate plan
Mr Clarke spoke out following a weekend of Tory warfare in which backbenchers branded Mr Cameron "corrosive" and a "liar" as they openly plotted to try to oust him even if Remain achieves a narrow win in the referendum.
Arch-Cameron critic Nadine Dorries predicted the Prime Minister would be "toast" even if Remain edged a win in the June 23 referendum and said she had tabled a letter seeking a no-confidence vote.
Fellow Brexiteer MP Andrew Bridgen insisted more than the 50 colleagues needed to trigger such a poll were ready to move against the PM.
They broke ranks as Mr Johnson branded Mr Cameron "corrosive" over his failure to meet a pledge to reduce net migration into the UK to the tens of thousands.
Mr Cameron will seek to brush off the Tory squall over his future as he attempts to shift the battle back on to the economic impact of Brexit with a joint appearance with Labour London mayor Sadiq Khan.
Mr Clarke repeated his view the party leader's authority would be "destroyed" and he would have to step down if the referendum was lost.
But he called for an end to in-fighting ahead of June 23.
"His authority will be destroyed and, as we can see, half the campaigners are campaigning because that is their principal hope. Who will succeed him I haven't the foggiest notion," he told BBC Radio 4's Today.
"It is no good turning the leave campaign into a kind of leadership bid for Boris Johnson and anti-immigrant fears.
"The public are getting fed up with Tory civil wars when they thought they were being asked about the future of this country for their children and grandchildren.
"All this stuff about whether one or two backbenchers have signed letters calling for David Cameron to resign, I think most of the public would agree, is a bit of a diversion.
"I think Boris and Donald Trump should go away for a bit and enjoy themselves and not get in the way of the serious issues which modern countries of the 21st century face."
Read more: Senior Conservatives urge for improvement over Investigatory Powers Bill
Pressed on his opinion of Mr Johnson, he said: "He is a much nicer version of Donald Trump but the campaign is remarkably similar in my opinion and about as relevant to the real problems that the public face."
The show of cross-party unity with Mr Khan comes just weeks after Mr Cameron lambasted the Labour figure's "poor judgement" during the bruising battle for City Hall.
The mayor defended his decision to share a platform with Mr Cameron - despite Labour MPs shouting the Prime Minister down in the Commons as a "racist" when he attacked the now mayor - because he said Remain was in London's interest and he did not want to hold grudges.
Number 10 dismissed the personal attacks as a "distraction" intended to move attention away from the economic arguments for remaining in the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel