Petrofac reported a net loss for the first half, hurt by a steep increase in costs at its Shetland Islands project, and said it still expected net profit for the year to be weighted towards the second half.
Shares in the oilfield services company rose 2.4 percent to 748.5 pence on Tuesday on the London Stock Exchange.
Oil and gas companies are scrambling to rein in costs and preserve margins as crude oil prices continue to hover at 6-year lows, suffering under a supply glut and weakening demand.
Adding to the oversupply concerns is the imminent lifting of the sanctions on Iran, which British foreign minister Philip Hammond said could be as early as next spring.
Iran, which holds about a tenth of the world's proven oil reserves and 18.2 percent of natural gas reserves, however, represents tens of billions in contracts for oil services companies.
Petrofac would seek to enter the Iranian market once major oil and gas companies start entering into contracts with local operators, Chief Financial Officer Tim Weller said.
"Given our strength in the middle eastern region, it will be a natural extension of our core onshore EPC (engineering, procurement and commissioning) business to start work in that particular country," he said on a call with journalists.
Representatives of Petrofac's rivals, Amec Foster Wheeler and Scottish industrial engineering firm Weir Group , visited Tehran last weekend as part of a delegation led by Hammond who reopened the UK embassy.
Petrofac posted a net loss of $133 million for the six months ended June 30, after recognising $236 million in losses from its Laggan-Tormore project in the Shetland Islands, compared with a net profit of $136 million a year earlier.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here