MC14/22 (Ceci Est Mon Corps)/Emergence
Scottish Ballet
Festival Theatre (run ended)
FOR its Edinburgh International Festival showcase, Scottish Ballet served up an austere double bill offering as much for the intellect as the senses. It came courtesy of French choreographer Angelin Preljocaj's challenging exploration of The Last Supper and the lives of the Apostles, and Canadian Crystal Pite's only slightly less chewy piece, inspired by a concept of insect behaviour known as “swarm intelligence”.
The first work, also known as MC Quatorze, functions as a hymn to the corporeal and the spiritual as 12 sweat-slicked male dancers, performing mostly in pairs, work through a punishing series of formations. Tenderness, homo-eroticism, violence, torture, it's all here: at one point soloist Andrew Peasgood is gradually (and brutally) immobilised using the kidnapper's favourite stationary item – parcel tape – and Constant Vigier proves himself a pretty decent counter-tenor as he battles through a plainsong chant as fists are shoved in his mouth to muffle him. Meanwhile the steel desks which started out as catacombs later become autopsy slabs and then a long dining table for a tableau representing the Last Supper, though with the dancers striking poses that nod to Greek sculpture as much as Christian iconography. The soundtrack, on-off bursts of glitchy dissonance and white noise, add to the power of the performance.
From that fierce 55-minute opening salvo, the intensity level drops a little with Emergence. By the end, all of the company's 37-strong corps will be swarming in formation, though the piece starts with a jerky duet evoking something spiky, angular and locust-like. Pite sees the dance stage as comparable with the insect nest so when the chirrups and clicks on the soundtrack give way to moody instrumentation, we watch the ballerinas goose-stepping en pointe or mimicking bar work as they count one through 11. As with MC14, it's all perfectly executed.
Not an obvious choice for an EIF programme, perhaps, but a pleasingly radical one from a company keen to show its eclectic side.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here