Music
RSNO, Glasgow Royal Concert Hall
Five Stars
IT’S not necessary to scale the ramparts and shout about the RSNO’s principal guest conductor, Thomas Sondergard. His work, and the RSNO’s exceptional performance and delivery of that work, speak pellucidly for themselves. He is simply one of the best conductors in the orchestra’s armoury. From Britten to Messiaen and Beethoven he has produced the goods, time and again. He’s a conductor you would trust with anything, and for whom, I believe, the orchestra could excel on every occasion in ensemble and authority. Honestly, how many conductors are there of whom you could say that? Sondergard is a man who knows what he’s doing and how to do it, and in whom the band clearly believes. He’s an intelligent, insightful director who knows how to communicate what he wants from an orchestra, and, moreover, how to stimulate in musicians sufficient confidence that they will know how to give it right back to him.
And that paid dividends right across the board on Saturday in a programme consisting exclusively of four symphonies, with two very different ones each by Schubert and Stravinsky. Sondergard was bang on the nail in Schubert’s Third Symphony, with its delicious classical wit and brio, and dead centre again with the relative darkness and drama of the same composer’s Fourth. The Danish musician then caught exactly the wit and precision of Stravinsky’s Symphony in C, before blowing the whole programme out of the water with a convulsive, explosive Symphony in Three Movements; worth a thousand words. Even better, go and hear him yourselves this week when he couples Bartok’s Miraculous Mandarin and the Rite of Spring: safety belts mandatory.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article