Sherlock star Martin Freeman has revealed that he did a "terrible" audition for the hit BBC detective show.
He told an audience at the Edinburgh International Television Festival: "I went in for it and apparently I did a terrible audition."
Freeman said they "sort of hated" him, thought he was a "moody p****" and seemed like he did not want it.
"I might well have been a moody p****but I really did want it," he said. Luckily, his next audition went better.
Freeman said they all thought the pilot episode was really good.
But he added that when the BBC said they wanted to make a 90-minute show, he thought: "These fools ... what's wrong with an hour? They're going to ruin it."
He said he thought it seemed "a bit silly", but added that he was "happily, extremely wrong".
The BBC's latest version of Arthur Conan Doyle's hero, starring Benedict Cumberbatch alongside Freeman as Holmes and Dr Watson, updates the story to modern-day London.
But the new clip, unveiled to fans at Comic-Con in the United States earlier this summer, shows the pair back on familiar ground in what seems to be Victorian London complete with horse-drawn hansom cabs clattering over the cobbles in Baker Street.
It shows Cumberbatch, complete with trademark pipe and deerstalker, explaining to his landlady Mrs Hudson (Una Stubbs) why he is late coming home, saying: "That's the trouble with dismembered country squires. They are notoriously difficult to schedule."
Asked if he caught the killer, he says: "Caught the murderer, still looking for the legs, think we'll call it a draw."
The hit show, created by Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat, is inspired by the original stories created by Arthur Conan Doyle.
It regularly pulls in huge audiences and has been a worldwide hit, propelling its two leading men to Hollywood and in Cumberbatch's case an Oscar nomination.
The third series bowed out last year with Holmes appearing to shoot villain Charles Augustus Magnussen, and teased viewers that Andrew Scott's criminal mastermind Moriarty may have cheated death and be set for a return.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here